What is your placement workflow silently costing you?
Most programs run their training-to-employment work on spreadsheets, memory, and good intentions. Few have ever put a number on what that's costing. Answer 4 questions and see yours — in dollars, hours, and missed placements.
Your program
Tell us four things. We'll do the math.
Your gap snapshot will appear here
Add your learner volume, staffing, and caseload. We will turn that into a clean estimate of lost hours, lost dollars, and recoverable placements.
Annual cost exposure
Dollars lost to workflow drag
Advisor time lost
Hours consumed by last-mile coordination
Missed placements
Learners most likely to fall through the gap
What You Unlock
A cost summary, a loss breakdown, and projected placement lift.
The math behind the number
These four costs are running in every program right now. Most don't measure them.
Time the engine handles
Each learner needs 6–11 hours of resume reviews, mock interviews, and follow-ups. The engine runs all of it in the background, freeing advisors to spend time on the people who need them.
Money the operations should generate
Loaded advisor cost runs $45–$55/hour. Hours spent on routine admin compound across cohorts. The engine recovers those hours so they go toward placements, not paperwork.
Placements you should be making
8–18% of learners don't place because of the operations gap, not because of skills. Overloaded caseloads push that further (up to 1.6×). The engine catches the operational drop-offs before employers do.
What you can recover
About 65% of lost placements come back when the operations gap closes. That's what the engine recovers, and what your funder will notice next quarter.
The operational drag isn't a budget problem. It's a structure problem. Fix the structure, fix the outcome.
Once you have your number, you have a decision.
Most programs sit on the number for a quarter before they act. The cohort you're running right now will cost you what this calculator says it costs you unless the operations change.